Technical Resources

ASTM A123 Multi-Specimen Test Article Coating Thickness Inspection Methodology

4.30.2025
8 minutes
Technician using an electronic coating thickness gauge to inspect galvanized rectangular steel tubing in an industrial shop.

Statistical Sampling for Coating Thickness Verification

Hot-dip galvanizing quality assurance relies on statistical sampling protocols recognizing that measuring coating thickness on every galvanized article in production lots containing hundreds or thousands of pieces proves economically and practically infeasible. ASTM A123, "Standard Specification for Zinc (Hot-Dip Galvanized) Coatings on Iron and Steel Products," establishes systematic sampling methodologies where randomly selected representative specimens undergo thorough coating thickness measurement, with results statistically extrapolated to entire production lots. This approach balances comprehensive quality verification against practical inspection resource constraints.

However, ASTM A123 inspection protocols differentiate between simple single-specimen test articles (small items like individual fasteners or simple brackets) and complex multi-specimen test articles (large fabrications or assemblies containing multiple material types or thickness ranges). Understanding this critical distinction—particularly the 160 square inch surface area threshold triggering enhanced inspection requirements—ensures proper acceptance determination while preventing both inappropriate rejection of conforming material and inadvertent acceptance of deficient coatings.

Fundamental Inspection Terminology

ASTM A123 employs specific hierarchical terminology establishing relationships between production units, sampling groups, and measurement locations:

Lot

Definition: The unit of production or shipment from which samples are taken for testing.

Practical Application:

A lot typically comprises:

  • All articles of same design galvanized in single processing batch
  • Multiple batches of identical articles processed on same day/shift
  • Shipment of same article type to single customer/project

Lot Size Determination:

Critical factor determining sample size requirements. May be defined by:

  • Count: Number of individual pieces (fasteners, brackets, small parts)
  • Weight: Short tons or metric tons (structural members, large fabrications)
  • Contractual agreement: Customer and galvanizer negotiated definition

Sample

Definition: A group of individual articles from the lot tested to determine conformance to specification requirements.

Sample Size:

ASTM A123 Section 7.3 establishes sample size based on lot size:

Number of Pieces in Lot                 Number of Test Articles Required

3 or less                                         All

4 to 500                                          3

501 to 1,200                                    5

1,201 to 3,200                                 8

3,201 to 10,000                              13

10,001 and over                             20

Selection Methodology:

Test articles selected randomly from throughout lot:

  • Avoid clustering from single basket or location
  • Represent different processing positions
  • True random selection (not "cherry-picking")

Test Article

Definition: An individual article from the sample examined for conformance to specification requirements.

Relationship:

Test articles are the physical galvanized pieces selected for inspection. Each test article may contain one or multiple specimens depending on size and complexity.

Specimen

Definition: The surface of an individual test article, or portion of a test article, where thickness measurements are performed.

Key Concept:

A specimen represents the measurement zone—the specific area where five or more thickness readings are taken and averaged. Simple test articles contain one specimen; complex articles may contain multiple specimens requiring separate evaluation.

Single-Specimen vs. Multi-Specimen Classification

The critical threshold distinguishing inspection approaches:

Single-Specimen Test Articles

Definition:

Articles meeting BOTH criteria:

  1. Surface area ≤ 160 in² (1,032 cm²)
  2. Comprised of only one material category AND one steel thickness range per ASTM A123 Table 1

Examples:

  • Small brackets (3" × 4" × 8" = 112 in² total surface)
  • Individual fasteners
  • Simple plates under 160 in²
  • Small tubular sections

Inspection Approach:

Entire article constitutes single specimen:

  • Five measurements distributed across entire article surface
  • Single average calculated representing article
  • Straightforward inspection

Multi-Specimen Test Articles

Definition:

Articles meeting ANY of following criteria:

  1. Surface area > 160 in² for any single material category or thickness range
  2. Contains multiple material categories per ASTM A123 Table 1
  3. Contains multiple thickness ranges per ASTM A123 Table 1

Examples:

  • Structural beams (large surface area)
  • Fabricated assemblies combining plate and tube
  • Assemblies with 1/4" and 1/2" thick components
  • Complex welded structures

Inspection Approach:

Article subdivided into multiple specimens each requiring separate measurement and evaluation—significantly more complex inspection protocol.

The 160 Square Inch Threshold

Rationale

The 160 in² (1,032 cm²) threshold represents:

  • Approximate surface area where five measurement locations provide adequate statistical representation
  • Practical limit for simple visual assessment of coating uniformity
  • Balance between inspection thoroughness and resource efficiency

Beyond 160 in²:

Larger surface areas require subdivision ensuring:

  • Adequate measurement density across entire article
  • Detection of localized coating thickness variations
  • Representative sampling of different coating zones

Surface Area Calculation

Obtaining Surface Area:

From Engineering Drawings:

  • Most accurate method
  • Design drawings typically specify surface area
  • Includes all accessible surfaces to be coated

Geometric Calculation:

For simple shapes, calculate manually:

Flat Plate: Surface Area = 2 × (Length × Width) + Perimeter × Thickness

Example: 12" × 24" × 1/4" plate = 2(12 × 24) + 2[(12 + 24) × 0.25] = 576 + 18 = 594 in² → Multi-specimen

Beam/Channel: Sum all surface areas (flanges, web, both sides)

Tube: External surface: π × Diameter × Length Internal surface (if coated): π × (Diameter - 2×Wall) × Length

Complex Fabrications:

  • Request from fabricator or engineer
  • Use CAD software surface area function
  • Conservative estimation if calculation difficult

Material Category and Thickness Range Separation

ASTM A123 Table 1 establishes minimum coating thickness requirements varying by:

Material Category

Categories per ASTM A123:

  • Structural Shapes: Beams (W, S, HP shapes), channels, angles
  • Plate: Flat plate stock
  • Pipe and Tubing: Round or rectangular hollow sections
  • Wire, Strip, Bar, Rod
  • Castings and Forgings

Inspection Requirement:

Different material categories within single test article must be evaluated as separate specimens even if coating requirement is identical.

Rationale:

Different categories exhibit different coating reactivity:

  • Plate vs. pipe may have different silicon content
  • Different surface conditions affect coating formation
  • Separate evaluation ensures each category meets requirements

Thickness Range

ASTM A123 Table 1 Ranges:

Material thickness significantly affects coating thickness:

  • <1/16" (1.6 mm)
  • 1/16" to <1/8" (1.6 to 3.2 mm)
  • 1/8" to <3/16" (3.2 to 4.8 mm)
  • 3/16" to <5/16" (4.8 to 7.9 mm)
  • ≥5/16" (≥7.9 mm)

Minimum Coating Grades:

Thinner steel = lower minimum coating requirement:

  • <1/16" steel: 3.5 mils minimum (Grade 85)
  • ≥5/16" steel: 2.0 mils minimum (Grade 50)

Inspection Requirement:

Different thickness ranges require separate specimen evaluation even if same material category.

Example:

Assembly containing:

  • 1/4" thick plate (Grade 75 required)
  • 3/4" thick plate (Grade 65 required)

Despite both being plate category, different thickness ranges mandate separate specimen inspection.

Multi-Specimen Inspection Procedures

Scenario 1: Large Single Material/Thickness

Description: Test article >160 in² comprised of single material category and thickness range

Example: W8×15 beam, 10 feet long

  • Material category: Structural shape
  • Thickness range: 1/4"-5/8" (flange and web within single range)
  • Surface area: ~4,300 in² (far exceeds 160 in²)

Subdivision Protocol:

Divide article into three continuous sections of equal surface area:

  • Section 1 (Specimen 1): 0-40 inches of length
  • Section 2 (Specimen 2): 40-80 inches of length
  • Section 3 (Specimen 3): 80-120 inches of length

Measurement:

Each specimen receives five or more measurements:

  • Distributed across flanges, web, and length within section
  • Avoid clustering measurements
  • Calculate average for each specimen

Acceptance:

Each specimen average must meet: Minimum - 1 grade All three specimen averages must meet: Required minimum when averaged together

Scenario 2: Multiple Categories/Ranges, Small Areas

Description: Test article containing multiple material categories or thickness ranges, but each individual category/range ≤160 in²

Example: Fabricated assembly containing:

  • 6" × 12" × 1/4" plate (144 in²) - Grade 75 required
  • 4" × 6" × 3/4" plate (72 in²) - Grade 65 required
  • 2" diameter × 24" long tube (151 in²) - Grade 75 required

Subdivision Protocol:

Divide by material category and thickness range:

  • Specimen 1: 1/4" plate (144 in² - no further subdivision needed)
  • Specimen 2: 3/4" plate (72 in² - no further subdivision needed)
  • Specimen 3: Tube (151 in² - no further subdivision needed)

Measurement:

Each specimen receives five measurements within its respective area.

Acceptance:

Each specimen average must meet: Minimum - 1 grade

Critical Final Average:

Because each category/range ≤160 in², average ALL specimens of same category/range across ALL test articles in sample:

  • Average all 1/4" plate specimens from all test articles together
  • Average all 3/4" plate specimens from all test articles together
  • Average all tube specimens from all test articles together

Each category/range average must meet required minimum.

Scenario 3: Multiple Categories/Ranges, Large Areas

Description: Test article containing material categories or thickness ranges where individual category/range >160 in²

Example: Pipe assembly containing:

  • 3" diameter, 1/4" wall pipe: 48" long (surface area = 470 in²) - Grade 75 required
  • 6" diameter, 1/2" wall pipe: 36" long (surface area = 679 in²) - Grade 65 required

Subdivision Protocol:

Step 1: Separate by material category/thickness range

  • Section A: 3" diameter pipe
  • Section B: 6" diameter pipe

Step 2: Further subdivide sections >160 in² into three equal parts

  • Section A (470 in² > 160): Divide into thirds
    • Specimen 1: 0-16 inches (157 in²)
    • Specimen 2: 16-32 inches (157 in²)
    • Specimen 3: 32-48 inches (157 in²)
  • Section B (679 in² > 160): Divide into thirds
    • Specimen 4: 0-12 inches (226 in²)
    • Specimen 5: 12-24 inches (226 in²)
    • Specimen 6: 24-36 inches (226 in²)

Total: Six specimens per test article

Measurement:

Each of six specimens receives five measurements distributed within its zone.

Acceptance:

Each specimen average must meet: Minimum - 1 grade

Average three specimens for each material/thickness category:

  • Average specimens 1, 2, 3 (3" pipe sections)
  • Average specimens 4, 5, 6 (6" pipe sections)

Each category/range average within each test article must meet required minimum.

Acceptance Criteria Hierarchy

Understanding the layered acceptance structure:

Level 1: Individual Measurements

Requirement: No specified minimum for individual spot readings

Caveat: Bare areas (uncoated spots) not permitted regardless of other measurements

Practical Reality:

Individual readings vary widely:

  • May range from 2-10 mils on same article
  • Variability from coating thickness variations, measurement location, gauge accuracy
  • Individual readings alone don't determine acceptance

Level 2: Specimen Average

Requirement: Average of five measurements per specimen must be ≥ (Required Minimum - 1 Grade)

Grade Steps (ASTM A123 Table 2): 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100 (in mils)

Example:

  • Required minimum: Grade 75 (3.9 mils)
  • Specimen acceptable if average ≥ Grade 70 (3.5 mils)

Rationale:

Allows individual specimen variation while ensuring no specimen drastically deficient.

Level 3: Test Article Average (Multi-Specimen)

Requirement for Single Material/Thickness >160 in²:

Average of three specimen measurements must meet required minimum.

Example:

  • Specimen 1 average: 3.6 mils
  • Specimen 2 average: 4.1 mils
  • Specimen 3 average: 4.0 mils
  • Test article average: 3.9 mils
  • Required: 3.9 mils (Grade 75) → Passes

Level 4: Sample Average

For Single-Specimen Test Articles:

Average of all test articles in sample must meet required minimum.

For Multi-Specimen with Categories ≤160 in²:

Average of all specimens of same category/range across all test articles must meet required minimum.

Best Practices for Accurate Inspection

Adequate Measurement Density

Minimum Requirement: Five measurements per specimen

Best Practice Consideration:

Complex specimens with multiple faces or components may require more than five measurements adequately representing entire specimen:

Example: Tubular frame section (one specimen)

  • Five measurements technically adequate
  • Better practice: 8-10 measurements sampling front, back, top, bottom, and ends proportionally
  • Ensures all orientations represented

Principle: Measurement density should reflect specimen complexity

Gauge Calibration and Verification

Calibration:

Formal calibration by manufacturer or qualified laboratory:

  • Frequency: Annually or per manufacturer recommendation
  • Documentation: Calibration certificate with traceability

Daily Verification:

Before each use, verify gauge accuracy:

  • Use calibration shims or coated standards
  • Check zero on uncoated steel
  • Verify readings at expected thickness range (e.g., 3-5 mils for typical galvanizing)
  • Adjust if readings deviate from standard values

Re-verification:

During use, re-verify after:

  • Dropping or rough handling
  • Extended measurement session (every 50-100 readings)
  • Unusual or suspicious readings

Critical:

Inaccurate gauge measurements leading to incorrect rejection or acceptance far more problematic than effort invested in proper verification.

Consistent Unit System

Recommendation:

Select either metric or imperial units and maintain throughout inspection:

  • Surface area calculations
  • Material thickness determinations
  • Coating thickness measurements and requirements

Avoid:

Unit conversions during inspection process increase error risk and confusion.

Common Inspection Errors

Error 1: Incorrect Subdivision Sequence

Wrong Approach: Divide large article into three equal areas FIRST, then separate by material category

Correct Approach: Separate by material category and thickness range FIRST, then subdivide any section >160 in²

Impact:

Incorrect sequence leads to:

  • Specimens mixing different categories/ranges
  • Inappropriate averaging
  • Potential acceptance of deficient material

Error 2: Combining Different Thickness Ranges

Scenario: Assembly with 1/4" and 1/2" pipe both requiring same coating grade (due to different categories)

Common Error: "Both need Grade 75, so inspect together as single specimen"

Correct Approach:

Different thickness ranges per Table 1 require separate specimens even if minimum requirement happens to be same grade.

Rationale:

Table 1 separates by thickness range for metallurgical reasons—thinner steel typically develops slightly thicker coating. Must verify each range meets requirement independently.

Error 3: Insufficient Sample Across Categories

Scenario: Multi-specimen test articles with small category/range areas (≤160 in²)

Requirement: Average all specimens of same category/range across ALL test articles in sample

Common Error: Averaging only within individual test articles

Result:

Missing the cross-article averaging requirement leading to incorrect acceptance determination.

Specification Clarification Note

2022 Update Context

ASTM A123 terminology using "specimen" and "test article" interchangeably for single-specimen articles created marketplace confusion regarding multi-specimen inspection protocols. Two different yet common interpretations emerged:

Interpretation A: Average all specimens within each test article separately

Interpretation B: Average all specimens of same category across entire sample

Resolution:

ASTM Subcommittee A05.13 reviewing specification language and figures for clarification in 2023 revision addressing:

  • Clearer terminology distinctions
  • Revised inspection flow diagrams
  • Explicit multi-specimen averaging protocols

Current Practice:

Until revised specification released, follow manufacturer interpretation or project specification requirements while maintaining documentation of applied methodology.

ASTM A123 multi-specimen test article inspection methodology requires systematic subdivision of complex fabrications exceeding 160 square inch surface area threshold or containing multiple material categories and thickness ranges, with articles divided into separate specimens receiving independent five-measurement averaging and acceptance evaluation. Single-specimen test articles (≤160 in² with single material category and thickness range) undergo straightforward five-measurement averaging with sample-wide averaging determining lot acceptance, while multi-specimen articles demand hierarchical evaluation where individual specimens must average minimum-minus-one-grade, test articles containing large single categories subdivided into three equal-area specimens must average to required minimum, and small categories (≤160 in²) require cross-article specimen averaging across entire sample. Critical inspection protocol elements include proper subdivision sequence separating by material category and thickness range before area-based division, recognition that different thickness ranges require separate evaluation even when minimum coating grade requirements coincidentally match, adequate measurement density with five-plus readings proportionally distributed across complex specimen geometries, and daily gauge calibration verification using traceable standards preventing systematic measurement errors causing inappropriate acceptance or rejection. The fundamental principle governing multi-specimen inspection recognizes that large surface area articles and complex assemblies require enhanced statistical sampling ensuring coating thickness uniformity across diverse article zones, multiple material types exhibiting different coating reactivity characteristics, and varying thickness ranges where metallurgical factors influence coating development—necessitating specimen subdivision and independent evaluation rather than simple whole-article averaging appropriate only for small, homogeneous single-specimen test articles under 160 square inches. To view the original AGA resource article, click this link.

Share to

Other Resources

Knowledge Base Article

ASTM A123-24: Key Changes to the Hot-Dip Galvanizing Specification

Knowledge Base Article

Progressive Dipping Methodology and Internal Corrosion Prevention for Utility Poles

Knowledge Base Article

Hot-Dip Galvanized Steel Performance in Aqueous Environments: Comprehensive Analysis of Corrosion Mechanisms, Water Chemistry Effects, and Application-Specific Considerations